a Business Spectator publication

Back in business?

The missing link in Australia’s climate change debate – a strong and unified business voice in support of a carbon price – may have finally been found.

The appointment of Lend Lease Australia CEO Rod Leaver as chairman of the National Business Leaders Forum on Sustainable Development could be the game changer that the current policy debate needs.

Leaver is determined to revitalise the NBLF committee groups and introduce what he describes as some “heavy hitters” – CEOs from Australia’s leading industrial groups – to call on the government, whichever political flavour it might turn out to be, to act soon on climate change.

Leaver told Climate Spectator in an interview on Wednesday that advocating a carbon price would be his first and biggest priority. “We need to take a pragmatic approach and develop a visionary leadership group that can come up with solutions,” he said. “This forum can set the agenda for how a carbon pricing mechanism may work, and come up with a fair and equitable approach which achieves a leadership position for Australia.”

The number of companies and business leaders calling for a carbon price in Australia has intensified recently, with most being deeply frustrated that they had to put investment decisions on hold because of constant political delays on introducing a carbon price.

Industry associations, including those representing heavy emitters, have called for clarity on the issue in an effort to unlock the tens of billions of dollars in stalled investments, but their arguments have been cannibalised by vested interests, and there has never been a broad coalition that was able to put pressure on Canberra to act, apart from those which didn’t want any action at all.

There have been numerous attempts at bringing business leaders together to speak with one voice – one as late as last week, when various environmental groups and climate change lobbyists tried to organise a common statement with business leaders to time with the visit to Australia and the national capital of Nicholas Stern, the eminent economist who was the lead author of the Stern Report that underlined the economic case for action on climate change.

In the end, it was impossible to get the sign-off from so many businesses in such a short period, so it was put on hold for a few weeks. Only a separate initiative that united environmental NGOs, unions, church groups, and charities managed to get their act together to issue a joint statement, ironically on the very day that the Greens struck a deal with the ALP and Prime Minister Julia Gillard committed to create a multi-party climate change committee that would look, specifically, at a carbon price.

“Most business people have known for some time what the right solution is, but they are not in the habit of asking for more regulation,” says Nathan Fabian, the head of the Investor Group on Climate Change, a grouping of institutions that account for more than half of the funds under management in Australia.

“It’s a big step for a lot of companies to bite the bullet and call for action. But if you believe in markets, and you want an efficient solution to the climate change problem, you have to stand up for a carbon price and a market mechanism to deliverer it.”

Getting them to do that, however, has been another matter. "A lot of businesses are nervous about standing up," says NBLF convenor Molly Harriss Olson, who ran Bill Clinton’s White House Office on Sustainable Development. She expects Leaver’s appointment, and the emergence of a high profile committee, will change those dynamics.

Leaver says his committee will be apolitical. “We are not quite sure which government it will be, but it doesn’t matter which party is in power, it will require industry and the government to work together. We want the government to see this as the body that they need to talk to.”

Leaver, who heads the country’s largest property and construction group, said the property industry was well positioned to take the lead in a push to the so-called green economy, because it was the industry that could most quickly and efficiently and cost effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“Australia is the leader in green building technology, so there is no reason why we can’t drive the agenda for how that may operate throughout the world. The time to act is now, we should be leading in this area.”

The NBLF expects to announce new members of its committee within the next week or so. Leaver wants these to be at CEO level, and expects to draw them from among the top 20 and top 50 companies on the ASX.

He wouldn’t reveal names at this stage, but they are expected to include at least some of the original members of the Business Roundtable on Climate Change, BP Australia, and Visy Industries, as well as the head of Energy Australia who, with a group of other companies, NGOs, think tanks, legal firms and others, signed a “call for comprehensive action on climate change” after the NBLFs national conference in May.

At that conference, the government sent environment minister Peter Garrett along to address the meeting. Leaver must anticipate that, with a bevy of Top 20 CEOs in tow, the NBLF might now be able to move higher up the political food chain.

Comments on this article

vested interests

At Lend Lease's AGM I heard how the company had accessed a lot of cheap solar panels out of the United States. The consumer pays $2000 to have a feel good panel on the roof and the tax payer pays $8000 per solar panel. Then there is the ongoing subsidisation of the very expensive electricity produced.

Business and a carbon price--or tax?

I can understand our need to be prepared to move in conjunction with the rest of the the world but why do we want to get ahead of others when we only contribute 1-2% of total emissions? We cannot solve the 'problem' if the big players decline to act. One would expect business to be cautious for good reasons of competitiveness.

Denis Ives

Interesting timing

Interesting timing. No need to let the electorate get involved with such worldly matters as changing the way we live and work. Who cares about a hung parliament when CEOs can now take the lead in setting up an unneccessary new industry to address a non-problem.

The carbon price lobby doesn't need to concern itself with interpretting the electorates decision or following the faulty data which underpins independently collapsing science. There are short term profits to be made.

We can only hope that perhaps some industry leaders will choose to take the long term view that economic destruction isn't good for business.

John Bennetts

John Bennetts - you are kidding yourself.

'Then we will indeed be able to settle down again, with safe, clean, emission free, reliable and inexhaustable power supplies 24/7/365 at the lowest total overall cost.' ---- that really made me laugh.

Safe? Clean? inexaustable? lowest total overall cost? - all funny statements!

Good your thinking about yourself John - not quite sure what you want to do with all the spent uranium - perhaps you can vote for an independant in your electorate and fight to have a nuclear dump in your area for the next 10,000 years. Your childrens childrens children will still be here then but maybe that doesnt matter to you.

ps make sure you notify google earth where you plan to put your nuke waste dump because bin laden and co would love to know - or whoever else the Liberals or rebublicans piss off around the world with their ignorance and unworldly attitude!

John Peach

Don't worry, John.  The number crunchers will eventually come to the realisation that nuclear power is the only way to achieve significant reduction of GHG.  I, for one, hope that this happens sooner rather than later, so that the various short term and very expensive subsidies of solar PV and wind can be placed into longer term focus. 

 

Then we will indeed be able to settle down again, with safe, clean, emission free, reliable and inexhaustable power supplies 24/7/365 at the lowest total overall cost.

carbon trading

While some 'investment decisions' may well be dependant on a 'carbon price' being set there is certainly more to this whole decision than business opportunities & profits & people right down to the poorist in world society could well be the unwilling & unprepared victims!

Lend Lease may see profits for their shareholders & in following the Stern Report but 'economists' are often not in the same ball park as most humans & profits are not the do all & end all of our existance on earth.

Leaver's claim that it was the property industry that could lead in reducing greenhouse emmissions is of course an overstatement.

At the moment Australians can do without more vested interest high-pressure groups as its citizens are now in great doubt about the actions & spin of political leaders & we need time to sort out the real truths & settle down again.