a Business Spectator publication

Clean energy: an insurance policy with no regrets

Opponents of the carbon price package will tell you it is a risk to our economy and puts Australia at a competitive disadvantage: in fact, the opposite is true.

Our historical advantage in low cost, high carbon pollution forms of energy is changing. The price of these fossil fuel-based forms of energy is increasing significantly, particularly as the export price for gas and coal increases.

The cost to generate electricity with traditional forms of fossil fuel based energy can only go up, while generating electricity from clean energy can only come down.

Australia is already being left behind in the clean energy race by countries like China and India. These countries are investing heavily in renewable energy technologies and both plan to roll out carbon trading schemes by 2015.

Last year, a record $243 billion was invested in renewable energy globally, more than conventional energy; China alone sank $51 billion into clean energy.

C.H. Tung, former chief executive of Hong Kong, told the New York Times recently: “China was asleep during the Industrial Revolution. She was just waking during the Information Technology Revolution. She intends to participate fully in the Green Revolution”.

The Chinese understand that developing renewable energy today will make it easier and cheaper to roll out in years to come. They are already ahead of the game in manufacturing solar panels and wind technology.

Australia has an abundance of renewable energy resources, but can do more to take full advantage of them. Wind, household solar, bio-energy and hydro are proven and ready to roll out now, along with the acceleration of energy efficiency across all sectors.

A price on carbon – endorsed this week by the International Monetary Fund – supported by Australia’s existing 20 per cent renewable energy target, can accelerate these technologies and drive emissions reductions in the energy sector.

But we also need to be investing in the technologies of the future – geothermal, large-scale solar and wave and tidal energy. We need to support these technologies now to ensure they are given every opportunity to be part of Australia’s energy mix in the future.

The $10 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation announced as part of the carbon price package can turbo charge renewable energy in Australia and set us up to make the deeper cuts to carbon pollution that science is already telling us will be required in years to come.

Australia’s energy sector is currently among the most carbon polluting in the world. That means we have more work to do. This needs a long-term view and we should not limit ourselves to arguments about what’s the cheapest option available today.

Just as investors in energy generation take a very long-term view – 10, 20 and 30 years – so must Australian policy makers. Any sensible energy policy must include support for renewable energy.

Some carbon price purists and media commentators have argued that additional support for renewable energy should be removed once a carbon price is introduced, citing recent reports by the Productivity Commission and others.

What they and others opposed to renewable energy are advocating is a very high risk strategy – waste our competitive advantage in renewable energy, use only the lowest cost abatement currently available today, then cross our fingers that gas remains underpriced, carbon capture and storage proves itself in the next decade or two, and that the Australian people miraculously change their mind about nuclear energy.

The carbon price package recognises the important role of government in backing new and innovative technologies and shaping the economy of the future. It is our lowest risk, lowest cost option over the long term; an insurance policy with no regrets.

Clean energy is not getting a free kick. Funding from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation will not be a slush fund – it’s a loan. Clean energy will be challenged to deliver viable, cost-effective solutions. There will be risk, and not all investments will succeed.

But if investors around the world have got it right in their support for clean energy, it should also make a lot of money.

Australia cannot afford to be left behind in the global clean energy race – a race with $253 billion in prize money last year, and many times that in years to come. The race has already started, but it’s not too late for Australia to catch up.

Kane Thornton is director of strategy and operations at the Clean Energy Council – www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au

Comments on this article

To John Bennetts

Sorry John - you need to read the article in detail. It is actually advocating (shock! horror!) a price on carbon

Addendum

The post I linked to above is from the web site of Dr James Hansen, Head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City and Adjunct Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Colombia University's Earth Institute.

His home page is at http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and personal bias is obvious.

It's sad to see that Climate Spectator has decided to print a blatant and misleading diatribe from a conflicted source.  Of course, your author would say what has been written - he's paid to do so, but the decision to publish such biased material was misguided.

 

At least the employer's name is appended at the foot of the article, so the bias is finally made clear.

 

"Clean" is not a title applicable only to the less safe, uneconomic, unreliable energy options such as PV and wind.  There are other clean alternatives, but rather than list them here, I suggest that people who are actually interested in how far renewables can carry us, how fast, and at what cost, should read http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110729_BabyLauren.pdf