Finding the key to sustainable trucking
Truck transport accounts for roughly 25 per cent of energy used in the global transport sector, making it a substantial contributor (2.6 per cent) to worldwide greenhouse gas emissions.
As concerns about greenhouse gas emissions continue to escalate, the introduction of zero-emission technologies within the freight industry is vitally important.
Here at RMIT University, we’ve developed new technology that, we believe, will push us further toward a sustainable and future-ready freight industry.
An industry under threat
Australia has some of the highest road lengths and freight levels per capita in the world. In fact, road freight transport is a $35 billion dollar industry here. Given the sheer size of the Australian land mass, the distance between major cities, and the lack of a feasible rail alternative, road freight is crucial to trade and commerce.
With the price of diesel fuel rising considerably in the past decade and the possible expansion of the carbon tax to include fuel for trucks, those in charge of the freight industry worry their industry is under threat. Low-carbon alternatives to the current fleet are needed.
A possible solution to the problem, and one that we’ve been working towards, is the development of hydrogen fuel cells to replace traditional diesel engines in trucks.
Hydrogen power
Hydrogen fuel cells work by taking hydrogen gas (H2) and combining it with oxygen (O2) to generate an electrical current (and water and some heat as byproducts).
The hydrogen gas is produced through a process called electrolysis (or breaking down) of water using electricity from renewable sources such as wind and solar.
A zero-emission solution of this kind (in both hydrogen production and consumption) could play a key role in addressing the environmental, economic and social factors that will influence the sustainability of the truck industry in the future.
Zero-emission alternatives
Electric battery technology is another zero-emission option that could potentially be used in the transport sector (if charged using electricity from renewable sources). But this technology might not currently be suitable for the truck industry due its low energy storage capacity. For example, existing battery technology doesn’t allow trucks to cover the distance from Melbourne to Sydney on one charge.
Biofuels, including ethanol, various bio-oils and biodiesel, provide another alternative transport fuel. “Second-generation” biofuels are likely to play some role for transport in future, but the amount of crops and land available for biofuel production will be severely limited.
Enough crops and land need to be set aside to supply food for a growing world population, and there are also constraints on available land, water and fertilisers needed to grow “second-generation” fuel crops.
But we focused on hydrogen …
Here in the School of the Aerospace, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Engineering at RMIT, we’ve recently developed Australia’s first model of a fuel cell truck running on hydrogen stored in metal hydride bottles on board the truck. The truck model is an exact replica (1/14th scale) of the Scania Highline series, operated using a remote control unit which simulates the performance of a typical long-haul truck used in Australia (from Melbourne to Sydney, for example).
A range of measurement instruments have been designed for and installed in the model, all of which are connected to a wireless data acquisition system. This system remotely monitors the truck’s performance and collects critical data such as the rate of hydrogen consumption and the electrical power supply in real-time.
By measuring the performance of the model under pre-defined dynamic loads and scaling up the results using purposely-developed mathematical models, the performance of a full-scale hydrogen fuel cell truck can be simulated and predicted.
What now?
In the early days of our research and development, we’ve highlighted some of the technical, economic and social challenges facing the commercialisation of this technology.
A key technical challenge is the development of cost-effective hydrogen storage systems that can carry enough hydrogen on board and provide desirable driving range (again, Melbourne to Sydney is a good example). Various materials/technologies for onboard hydrogen storage are currently being researched and developed to overcome this barrier.
Such technologies include high pressure hydrogen (at 350 and 700 bar, liquid hydrogen and chemical hydrides.
Hydrogen production and distribution are other areas to be considered for further technological development. Hydrogen fuel cells and the required renewable energy technologies for zero-emission production of hydrogen are currently too expensive for commercial development.
That said, the price of hydrogen cells is dropping – they cost roughly $2,000/kilowatt at the moment and that will probably drop to less than $100/kilowatt within 15 years.
Given this current downward trend in prices and the likelihood of such cells being mass produced within a decade, such technologies might not be restrictively expensive in future.
Perception power
Of course, there are also social barriers to be overcome. In particular, there is a public perception that hydrogen is unsafe and unreliable as an energy carrier. The demise of the Hindenburg in 1937 is largely to blame for this perception.
In reality, hydrogen has been proven safer than liquid fossil fuels such as diesel and petrol, if handled properly and if appropriate safety measures are taken.
So while there are still significant challenges to overcome before we see hydrogen-powered trucks on Australian roads, we’re certainly moving in the right direction.
Dr Bahman Shabani is a Researcher in Energy Conservation and Renewable Energy at RMIT University
Aleksandar Subic is Professor, Head of School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at RMIT University
John Andrews is Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering at RMIT University
This article was originally published on The Conversation – theconversation.edu.au. Reproduced with permission.

Comments on this article
I will never make this
I will never make this mistake again, to buy an electric car. I admit that at first I was so exciting, but after I took it for a ride all my expectations were down. The car starter broke down twice and I remained without "fuel" many times. I don't care how cheap is an electric car, a normal car is the best solution for me at this moment.
Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Management is process of synchronizing the flow of physical goods and associated information from the production line of low level component suppliers to the end consumer
http://www.strideklogistics.com.sg
Your knowledge of this
Your knowledge of this subject comes through clearly in this article. I love to read this kind of articles, I hope you will update it. Thank you for sharing it with me. Atlanta treadmill
trucks for delivery, trains for long hauls
Check this article.
Strong results keep US rail boom on track
The owners of the eastern United States' largest railroad network, CSX Corporation, and Canada's largest network, Canadian National, have provided the full-year earnings season's first evidence of the sector's continuing robust health, both reporting record earnings for the fourth quarter.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/60558fe4-469d-11e1-89a8-00144feabdc0.html
Finding the key to sustainable trucking...........
Quote:
......"simulates the typical performance of a long-haul truck used in Australia (from Melbourne to Sydney , for example) "...
Good Grief !!!!!
That sort of distance is a local-delivery best performed by a courier riding a pushbike !
Get real !!!!!
Australia is L A R G E !!
Rail or trucks need REAL FUEL to cope with the distances involved in Australia and you seem to be light years away from facing that reality.
Don't let me discourage you or stop you from attempting a solution..............but until you can come up with a "synthetic diesel fuel" you are wasting EVERYONE'S time !
Hydrogen dreams
The Energy Return on Energy Invested is (ERoEI) the arrow straight to the heart of this proposal. The generation of hydrogen with electricity is inefficient. The compression of the gas uses much electricity. The transport of the gas to refilling stations is wasteful. Trucks cannot be parked in unvenilated places. Hydrogen leaks cannot be stopped.
Fuel cell lifetime is uneconomic.
Much more efficient to use the electricity to run trains. Overseas trains with trucks on board are used. The drivers have a sleeping cars coupled on and so stay with their trucks.
The litrature on energy contains masses of data on the hydrogen failure in this type of application.
we can do it without fighting like ally cats in heat
We can have all of it. We can have a good trucking industry, we can have a good rail system and we can achieve excellent environmental outcomes. The trucking industry will grow as the population grows and more and more goods need to be delivered. It is impossible to create a rail system which ever will overcome the need for trucks to deliver goods. The issue is long distance freight for which shipping (yes ships) and trains are far the better options. Out ports again will make it highly unlikely that we ever see a redevelopment of coastal shipping. The big opportunities are long distance train services. The systems provide great opportunities for change. Electrification of these lines opens the feed-in potential of renewable energy. For example along the rail line between Adelaide and Perth there is enough wind power to run trains. It can also supplement electricity supply along the line to provide power to the grid. Long distance rail lines can support the trucking industry to overcome high fuel costs. Our transport system has a lot of opportunities for synergism and I hope our pollies spend more time looking at ways to help Australia instead of fighting each other like ally cats in heat.
Hydrogen is not a practical fuel
Hydrogen is an energy-dense fuel but consider how it's going to be transported to filling stations for fuel cell vehicles to fill up? Gaseous hydrogen is currently transported in massively heavy cylinder "bombs" under great pressure. A 20 tonne truck carries only a tiny amount compared to liquid fuels, LPG or LNG. The cost of pressurisation to 300 bar or more is massive, they take ages to fill and decant and the infrastructure cost is huge. A tanker of liquid hydrogen could carry a sensible quantity but then the cost of refrigeration, tanks, vaporisers, compressors and other equipment is even bigger and there are still major safety issues in doing this. Finally I would add that for fuel cell use hydrogen must be ultra high purity grade with only a few parts per million impurities. This is difficult and expensive to achieve. In theory hydrogen is a great fuel, in practise it's impractical.
Why not power trains with hydrogen cells?
Why not power trains with hydrogen cells?
A single train can take the same load as at least 140 trucks, and I mean the big rigs.
Trains are less likely to crash through bedrooms as did one big truck recently at Urunga in NSW. Well, whoever designs highways to go through towns thinking only of traffic and not of the safety of the residents.
Trains are more community friendly.
We need a mix of transports to cope with the unusual demographic spread in Australia.
Trucks that are not as big as houses are fine for short hauls from hubs where they integrate with trains using the well-subscribed RoLo method practised in nations we like to ally ourselves with.
Hydrogen containers?
I was under the understanding that making and compressing hydrogen to the high pressures required was difficault and wasteful. The ongoing onboard containment as hydrogen permeates most metals under the pressures needed. There are considerable technical obstacles are there not.