Flagships stumble: Solar funding stalls on the grid
The future of the federal government's $1.5 billion Solar Flagships program is in limbo, after both winning consortia failed to meet Thursday’s deadline for financial close.
As predicted here two weeks ago, neither the $1.2 billion Solar Dawn project, which proposes to build a 250MW solar thermal facility in Queensland, and the $923 million Moree Solar Project, which plans a 150MW solar PV facility in the north of NSW, have been able to strike power purchase agreements, the necessary pre-requisite to get finance from the banks.
Both consortia will now have meetings with officials from the Department of Energy and Resources – at least one as early as today – to discuss the next move. Both will push for extensions, arguing that the state of the market in Australia has made it impossible to strike PPAs.
Losing bidders, including two solar PV projects that already had energy utilities AGL and TruEnergy on board, an effective guarantee of a PPA, are standing ready. The two winners are expected to argue that they have made considerable progress in other areas of their projects, including local development approval, and deserve extra time. They will likely point to the precedents in other grants programs (see below) and the unique nature of the scale and type of these projects.
Still, given the political rhetoric around clean energy and government support programs, the issue threatens to become a potentially difficult one for the government over its choice of consortia and technology, and the sheer scale of the project – most other countries have begun their solar rollouts with much more modest projects.
Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson was asked about the program's status by Climate Spectator on Thursday. He said: “Obviously that’s being handled by my department in association with the Flagships program advisers. If I remember correctly, the process of consultation with the two Flagships selected concludes today. The Department’s responsibility is to assess the outcomes of those negotiations and discussions, and in due course they’ll bring forward a report to me, and on the basis of that report I’ll assess where the program is up to.”
The Moree project is backed by BP Solar, Spanish developer Fotowatio and Australia’s Pacific Hydro, while the Solar Dawn project is supported by French nuclear giant Areva, UK-based Wind Prospect CWP, and CS Energy. Those waiting in the wings include include two ventures between First Solar and TRUenergy and AGL; an Infigen/Suntech venture; and in the solar thermal space, the Solar Flare project including Siemens, Parsons Brinckerhoff and John Holland.
The progress of the Solar Flagships projects is being keenly watched – both in the context of these projects, and for the rollout of large-scale solar in Australia – and it has deep implications for the prospects of a second found of funding in the flagships program, and the structure of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation. Many argue that it underlines the case for ditching the grants-based programs that have been the feature of both the Labor and Howard governments in favour of the sort of mechanisms being considered for the CEFC.
The overwhelming feature of the grants-based program over the last five years has been that plenty of money has been announced, but very little spent, as the Grattan Institute concluded in an in depth report earlier this year.
The other major funding program, the Renewable Energy Development Program, is also behind schedule. The funding deed for the $60 million grant for the Solar Oasis solar thermal project in Whyalla is still to be finalised, nearly 18 months after the project was originally due to begin construction. Government spokespeope say that the deed should be finalised shortly.
Meanwhile, there has been little progress on the OPT wave energy project in Victoria, a controversial choice at the time. A spokesperson for the department said the Victorian Wave Partners project has met its first crucial milestone which was to demonstrate the OPT Power Buoy 150 technology in waters off Scotland earlier this year. The consortium is in regular contact with the Department on the progress of the project.

Comments on this article
Research and Sustainability
I conducted hours of research as part of the solar flagships and placed a bid. The price for large scale solar should be around $3/Wp, This was around 2 years and is cheaper now. The Government yet again has not seen what projects have been implemented off shore and the results. eg. In NZ the insulation problems occured far earlier than the roll out in Aus, therefore they should of seen the problems which could occur. Solar thermal does make sence with storage to meet peak demands. We all need to think about sustainabilty and non reliance on fossil fuels.
Need large scale rather than small scale...
I think we need to move away from the residential small scale installations that don't really offer a long term solution but make people feel good about doing their "bit" so they can continue to run their air conditioners and sit smugly in front of their 60 inch flat screen televisions...
Large scale solar offers much better efficiency of generation because it will be sited in places with a far superior solar resource, whereas most residential is in marginal areas at best.
And if we're going to understand the impications of large scale generation on the (oh so precious) grid we need to actually bite the bullet and build some,
Large scale solar thermal also offers the ability to store solar energy until it is needed, and overseas studies (see NREL report by Denholm and Mehos http://www.nrel.gov/csp/pdfs/52978.pdf) show how this bufferinng can help PV penetration as well ...
And every study since Sargent and Lundy's landmark 2003 study has highlighted that costs will fall (as they did in fact with the SEGS plants) with deployment. The catch is that deployment takes some money and commitment - as in Spain and the USA. Bring on the CEFC and let's get this show on the road!
Renewable Spin
Clearly what we see from this Government is All spin no action. Moving Forward slowly doesn't even capture the real state of play in this whole area.
One of the real values of residential (and I agree with Chris the residential costs are a fraction of those in the ludicrous large scale solar projects which are even more expensive when you look at solar thermal) is that they do not suffer the massive energy losses along the transmission lines.
Why don't they just step up and act. Use the same economic irrationality strategy that they use for NBN, Pink Batts and the BER. They are happier to waste a billion on a host of follies than actually spend a billion on renewables.
Cost of flagship schemes
Chris
is $3.65 after rebates?
Solar with storage
The major reason to go with solar thermal rather than PV is that you can store the heat in molten salt overnight and thus provide continuous power. It's madness that the Solar Dawn flagship does not use storage which is necessary to move from fossil fuels.
Distributed Energy First
These big flagship projects are very poor value for money. 150MW for $923 million is $6.15 per watt. Even without STC rebates I can sell you a residential 3kw solar system for $3.65 per watt fully installed without even pushing my suppliers for discounts. Clearly residential solar pv is half the price of this grand project. Can someone please explain to me what the government is trying to achieve?