Origin of an energy revolution
For more than a century, energy retailers have delivered their produce at the door of the house and pretty much left it that. Apart, of course, from sending a quarterly bill, and fielding cranky calls about the occasional blackout. Now, it seems, they want to come inside the home and share the experience, and the mystery, of exactly how much it costs to consume electricity.
The roll-out of in-house display systems for energy use promises to revolutionise the way the consumers understand and consume energy.
Origin, the largest retailer in the country, has kicked it off by announcing the largest pilot scheme of in-home displays in Australia – one that will involve 5,000 households over the next six months. But the rollout has far greater implications than consumer experience: it also promises to revolutionise the way that energy utilities conduct their business.
The basic business model of the energy utility has not changed for decades. It’s a simple model that revolves around selling as many electrons to as many customers as they can. But technology has caught up with the industry and, combined with the need to respond to rising costs, conserve energy and reduce emissions, the rollout of the “smarts” – meters, displays and appliances – is poised to cause as dramatic a restructuring as occurred in the banking industry in the 1980s and the telecommunications industry in the 1990s.
How the utilities manage that transformation could decide how they evolve and maintain influence over their industry, as the major banks have managed to do in theirs, and how much third party corporates such as Google, Intel and others come to play a dominant role, as a range of new companies have done in telecommunications.
“We’ve been in one paradigm for the last 100 years,” says Phil Craig, the head of retail at Origin Energy. “The electrons came down the poles and wires, you got the bill in the mail and you went into the post office and wrote the check. That hasn’t changed much, but we re now looking at a whole different model.”
A report released last year by Ernst & Young entitled Seeing Energy Differently described the challenge facing energy utilities in dealing with the providers of new “smart technology” and responding to the demands of improved efficiency. Basically it came down to two options: either the utilities form partnerships with third parties to help consumers manage their energy and evolve the model into a new, sophisticated form of energy service; or they stonewall and come under competitive attack all along the value chain.
Origin has clearly decided to evolve rather than having change thrust upon them. “The telecommunications industry is not like it was 15 years ago, it has experienced radical change,” says Craig. “That‘s what is going to happen to energy over the next 10 years, so we want to be in the best position to manage that.”
Origin has chosen as its partner the Colorado-based Tendril, which provides an in-home display that allows customers “unprecedented visibility” into energy usage, personalised estimates of monthly electricity bills and the ability to control household consumption. It allows communications over the web, mobile phone and home area networks, and can link with smart appliances and electric vehicles. And, of course, the energy company can see this information too.
Exactly how that business model will evolve is not yet clear because there are so many different factors that can still be brought to bear. But for Australian energy consumers, in-house displays – which look something like the dashboard displays in your car – are not far away. After the six-month pilot, Origin intends to then roll out the displays to all its 4.6 million customers – although the extent to which this can happen will depend on the rollout of the underlying infrastructure, which in this case is smart meters.
Craig says that by the end of the decade, consumers can expect to have smart appliances in their home that can respond to a pricing signal and turn themselves off. There will be charge points in the garage where the plug-in electric vehicle can choose the best time to charge itself, or even send electrons back into the grid. And, says Davis, there could be much larger solar systems on our homes.
And just as electric vehicle batteries will be able to be purchased under a leasing phone, just as people buy plans for their mobile phone, consumers might want to negotiate similar packages with their electricity supplier, possibly via third parties such as electrical retailers.
Hence the need for the utilities to try and remain in control of the business model. Does Origin fear that there will be non-traditional energy companies trying to steal their lunch? “It is quite possible,” he says.
“It will be a whole different model. Energy will be a more engaging product, people will be more interested and more actively thinking about it. We have got to try and stay ahead of the trends, adapt and try to understand what the new business model looks like.”
And the cost? The rollout of smart meters has gotten bad press, because so far it has involved higher electricity bills with little ability to modify behaviour.
Craig says the in-home displays should change those dynamics. But the cost that people will be paying in years to come will be governed as much by generation and network costs, as it will by in home displays. And other factors will also come into play, such as solar, which will be more economically viable and could lead to larger systems. “It depends how people react. But we will be putting power into the hands of consumers, so if they want to do something about it, they can change the nature of their consumption."

Comments on this article
MOVING MORE CONSUMPTION TO OFF PEAK
Anna bligh is talking about an off peak system for pools that does not require hard wiring. Claims it will reduce peak power demand. Principle should be extended to other forms of power consumption that do not have to be "on demand"..
Origin of an Energy Revolution
It’s interesting to read how the energy industry is revamping its business model. However they don’t mention their real competition.
The real threat to the electricity industry is the threat of distributed clean energy systems.
Two things are happening: First, we have to stop burning fossil fuels like coal to generate electricity and that industry is refusing to move fast enough to satisfy those who believe the science on Global Warming. At the same time the cost of installing distributed electricity systems at our own homes and businesses is dropping fast.
My hunch is that Origin and others are freaking out at the rate at which distributed solar installations were happening with the FIT support as they saw their market starting to disappear far faster than they expected. I strongly suspect that the implicit threat they hold over the politicians is the major reason why O’Farrell has reneged on the FIT in NSW with retrospective legislation.
At a personal level we are very much looking forward to being able to afford battery back-up and thus not subsidizing the burning of coal by having to buy electricity from the grid for either home, office and ultimately transport.
Ignorance or attempted wit?
Giles,
If I've being buying electrons for years, I'd like to sell them back now. How much should I expect to get for them and how should I gather them up?
Energy Revolution
Utilities companies must break out of their systems whereby those who use less are penalised by high initial and fixed charges and those who consume more are rewarded by lower, pro rata, unit charges as consumption increases.
A much better, and fairer for all, system of pricing would be to lower the fixed charges and then pro rata increase unit charges as consumption increases.
This will penalise high consumers and reward lower consumers with, hopefully, an incentive to decrease consumption overall with a general decrease in Greenhouse Gas production and Pollution.
Given that our ever increasing population is our greatest problem an added positive spin off may be a slow down in population growth as the incentive to irresponsibly have larger families will not be as great as it will cost a lot more in utilities bills.
how private companies work...
Michael, how can Origin reduce churn except by providing a better service to their customers? you seem to have fallen for the false logic that "since this company is trying to make profits it must be bad news for me". That's nonsense. Companies make profits by maximising revenues minus costs. So they need to win customers, then retain them, but whilst spending as little as possible to serve them. Naturally they get the balance wrong sometimes, which results in poor service and we the consumers get frustrated with them. If we get really frustrated we leave and go to another service provider. Then the ones that get the balance right more often than not thrive and the ones that don't have to up their game or go to the wall. That's competition for you.
We as consumers have benefited from this dynamic in banking and telecoms over the last 20 years - we just don't always notice as each new innovation becomes commonplace and we take it for granted, whilst remembering in painful detail each time we had a fruitless half-hour on the phone navigating the mysteries of the call centre or the technology breaks down.
There's no fundamental reason why, as technology enables energy service providers to offer more innovative services, we shouldn't see comparable changes in energy. A lot will depend however on the policy and regulation settings that the indsutry has to operate within.
Energy Revolution??
What? It's a revolution when an Australian company finally catches up with the rest of the world? I just hope it is better than the Google metre!
The one aspect of this which needs to be mentioned is that Origin are not doing this becasue it provides a better service to customers. This is all about customer churn. Placing a proprietary in home display is all about chrun reduction which has a direct impact on working capital.