a Business Spectator publication

Billions needed to boost food production, says DuPont committee

By Carey Gillam

KANSAS CITY, Missouri (Reuters) - High-tech seeds and innovations in chemicals and farming will not be enough to solve looming food shortages for the world, according to a report issued Tuesday by a committee formed by food and chemicals conglomerate DuPont.

Billions of dollars in private investment, government incentives and charitable work must be funneled into collaborative projects if global food production is to match growing demand, the report urged.

Both biotech and organic farming will play a role, said the report by the DuPont Advisory Committee on Agricultural Innovation & Productivity for the 21st Century.

"People are starting to recognize that food demand is outstripping supply," said DuPont executive vice president Jim Borel, who oversees DuPont's agriculture and nutrition business.

"If the world doesn't figure out how to effectively deal with this challenge, then the results are ugly," he said. "It is becoming clear... that society has to figure out ways to work together differently than we ever have."

World economic and agricultural leaders have projected the world's population will surpass 9 billion by 2050, and 10 billion by the turn of the century. And they have forecast that global food production must jump 70 percent or more to meet demand.

Indeed, global grain stocks are currently at historically low levels, sparking high prices for corn, wheat, soy and other crops.

Such dire warnings have prompted a rush by investors and public and private groups to buy up agricultural land, and have agriculture seed and chemical companies like DuPont and its competitors rushing to roll out higher-yielding seeds and more potent fertilizers and herbicides.

The report stated that lagging public policy support for increased food production, outdated and ineffective infrastructure, and a lack of cohesive efforts by public and private players were among the many hurdles to increasing food production.

Africa and south and southeast Asia were pegged as key areas in need of cohesive development efforts.

"There is nothing easy about what we have to do," said former Sen. Tom Daschle, who chaired the committee. "This is one of the greatest challenges facing the human race."

He said billions of dollars will have to be spent to achieve nutritious and adequate food supplies for the world's population.

"It is going to take tremendous financing if this is going to happen. If we don't do this collectively and in a collaborative way, then we are going to fail," Daschle said.

The recommendations issued by the five-member committee included a call for increased long-term corporate investments in emerging markets to create jobs and raise incomes and to improve education and youth development; government incentives for those private-sector investments; and stronger intellectual property rights and land rights provisions.

The committee also said that governments need to adopt harmonized regulations for plant biotechnology, such as the genetically altered corn seed developed by DuPont and rival seed companies.

Investments are also needed for roads and bridges, as well as storage and processing facilities, according to the report.

And the report cited subsidies and trade distortions as problems that have distorted the international food and agricultural system.

In addition to Daschle, the other committee members are Charlotte Hebebrand, chief executive of the International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council; J.B. Penn, chief economist for Deere & Co.; Pedro Sanchez, co-chair of the Hunger Task Force of the Millennium Project, an advisory body to the United Nations; and Jo Luck, president of nonprofit Heifer International and co-winner of the 2010 World Food Prize.

(Reporting by Carey Gillam; Editing by John Picinich)

Comments on this article

Are we running out of food?

Humans supported per hectare is not a particularly useful measure of farm productivity. Productivity of agricultural systems are usually constrained by the "limiting factor". Land area can be a limiting factor. Other limiting factors include suitably skilled labour, essential soil nutrients, soil structure, appropriate mechanical equipment, access to markets and capital. Adequate rainfall or irrigation water availability combined with suitable drainage is, in many places, the main limiting factor to agricultural productivity. Attempts to centrally plan agricultural production have a particularly poor track record. High prices for food encourage food production. Low prices for food discourage food production and also lead to food waste. Market based systems are useful to establish the real price.

So we are running out of food?

 

 

First point: China currently produces enough food to supply the needs of 12 people per hectare, and they do it largely using organic techniques.  America and other Americanised nations with their huge commercial farms, taxpayer subsidies, carbon intensive mechanical tools, petro-chemical fertilisers agricultural chemicals, genetic engineering and now nano technology, produces only enough for fewer than 3.4 people per hectare.  Europe is about 6.0 per hectare.  On that basis there does not appear to be much benefit in acid created, genetically modified corn based, additive enhanced, trans-fat stiffened, sugar and fat engineered donuts, topped off with sparkly nano particle enhanced icing.  Hmmm? 

Second point:  It is estimated that food wasted by the developed world could feed the world three times over. This food waste contributes to excess consumption of freshwater and fossil fuels which, along with methane and CO2 emissions from decomposing food, impacts global climate change.  It is now estimated that between 30% and 40% of all food produced in these countries is wasted.  Of this, one third is lost between the paddock and the shop, another third by the retailer and another one third by the consumer.

Third point:  During the Second World War, Britain started to run out of food and was forced to impose food rationing.  The government realising the dangers, and in spite of being short of labour, encouraged people to grow more locally produced vegetables and other whole foods.  By the end of the war, health officials acknowledged that the British population had never been healthier.  Amazing,